home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- > > Hi, all there...
- >
- > Hi there..
-
- Hi you,
-
- > Use Motorola's 56K assembler, Brainstorm's DSP debugger and everything will work
- > just fine. Use anything else and you are asking for trouble.
-
- So there is people using the Brainstorm DSP debugger? Cool. :-)
- I thought it was more or less useless as it wasn't finished. Atleast that is
- what I have heard.
-
- > Compiled DSP might allow novices to use the DSP, but I don't see the point as you
- > don't learn anything about DSP that way and you loose most of the performance which
- > makes the DSP useful. Better to learn some asm - even if it's just a little bit.
-
- It's easy for you to say who have programmed in assembler before you could walk.
- Some of us doesn't program any assembler and never will. I still think the DSP
- could be used in some way. I know that there are alot of people programming
- other DSP's in C, like Texas Instruments DSP C40. Maybe it's very different from
- the 56001, but they do it.
-
- Maybe the biggest problem is that the DSP memory is so small?
- Maybe someone could do a better C-compiler for the 56001?
-
- > BTW, do you have a version of DSPDebug with a working send/recieve buffer feature?
- > The developer's copy I have seems to be 'incomplete'...
-
- Which version do you have?
-
- //Magnus Kollberg
-
-